brand

Brand positioning tip #2: the competitive frame of reference


In Brand Positioning Tip #1, we covered 2 of the 4 key elements of successful brand positioning done the way Dr. Kevin Keller taught me: points of parity and points of difference. Today, I’d like to highlight the third key element of good brand positioning– understanding your competitive frame of reference.

strategicbrandmanagement

Competitive frame of reference is a fancy way of saying “the market you compete in.”

This sounds pretty simple, huh? It can be… If you run a furniture store, your competitive frame of reference would probably be the furniture market. If you run a tattoo parlor, your competitive frame of reference would probably be the tattoo market.

Those are pretty cut and dry cases. But have you ever stopped and wondered to yourself, “exactly what market am I competing in?” and realized that you are really competing in a market that is not initially obvious? Or that you are actually competing in multiple markets? If either of these situations are true, you may discover you need to create points of parity and points of difference for each market where you compete.

Here is an common example of a less-than-obvious competitive frame of reference.

What market do you think Starbucks is in? The coffee market? Maybe. In the coffee market, Starbucks competes with grocery stores, fast food restaurants, other coffee shops, and home brewers. Tough market… they aren’t competitive in the coffee market on price, there are probably options that (arguably) taste better, maybe have shorter lines. It’s hard to believe that Starbucks would have grown as big as they are by simply competing in the existing coffee market.

Well, in addition to competing in the coffee market, Howard Schultz has been known to say that Starbucks is competing to be your “third place.” The third place is the other place you want to hang out besides your first place (your home) and your second place (your work). In this competitive frame of reference, Starbucks is competing with all sorts of different places, only some of which are coffee shops. He competes with bookstores, bars, restaurants, parks, libraries… the list of potential third places could go on.

For years, Starbucks has been differentiating itself not just on the quality of its coffee, but also on its experience, which is an attempt to position Starbucks as a place to hang out, relax, or work on par with or better than your favorite restaurant, bar, park, bookstore, etc.

That’s why Starbucks spends so much time with the music, the ambiance, the wacked out drink names that make you feel like you are reciting chants when you order them. It is all part of creating an air of comfort, relaxation, familiarity, exclusivity, and all of the other things that you look for in your preferred hang out spot.

I’m not a Starbucks fan, but it’s in part because I’m not in the market for a third place. I like my first and second places a lot. I’m in the market for a great cup of iced coffee.

But every time I go into a Starbucks, I see tons of people who have their laptops open, or are reading newspapers, or meeting with friends or business associates, so there must be a lot of other people who are in the market for a third place. Small business owners, salespeople who work on the road, people whose home life sucks… clearly the Starbucks positioning in the third place market must be working or there wouldn’t be one everywhere you look.

Just remember your competitive frame of reference might not be what it seems to be at first glance. You may think you are in one business and find a competitive frame of reference that offers you even more opportunity to broaden your customer set to people you may not have considered before.

You may even find that you need to consider brand positioning in multiple competitive frames of reference, each which might give you different points of parity and points of difference.

For example, Red Hat competes in the enterprise software market. But we also compete in the open source software market against a different set of competitors claiming very different points of parity and points of difference.

Carefully consider the points of parity and points of difference for each of your competitive frames of reference, and you’ll be on your way to creating a solid brand position.

Was this post helpful?

If so, you can find more tips about how to position your brand effectively in my book, The Ad-Free Brand (not an advertisement, mind you, just a friendly suggestion:).

Only $9.99 for the Kindle, but available in each of these formats:
Book
| Kindle | Nook | EPUB/PDF

About Chris Grams

Chris Grams is President & Partner of New Kind, where he builds sustainable brands, cultures, and communities in and around organizations. He is the author of The Ad-Free Brand: Secrets to Successful Brand Positioning in a Digital World and is the Community Guide on the Management Innovation Exchange (hackmanagement.com).

Discussion

9 thoughts on “Brand positioning tip #2: the competitive frame of reference

  1. To totally pull a non-important point out of the middle of your great post (enlightening, btw, hadn’t thought of the points of parity and points of difference in this complete way before.)

    In my various searches for good coffee and a great iced coffee, I have found that one of my favorites is a king iced Americano at Cup o’Joe by the Red Hat offices in Raleigh. Ironically, that place also serves as a ‘third place’ of sorts for people in the RHT office looking for a strong cup and a break away from meeting in the office. Odd, eh?

    Posted by Karsten Wade | July 11, 2009, 1:01 pm
  2. Great post! Competitive frame of reference is no more a stranger to me. You make it much more simple than I’ve ever thought.

    Posted by Manuntun Sitinjak | July 13, 2010, 1:43 am
  3. Great stuff Chris.

    I lived in San Francisco when Starbucks moved into town in a big way in the early 90s. Starbucks succeeded because few people in SF like their first two places. Houses and apartments in SF are small so people meet at a “third place.’ Starbucks won out as the old smoke-filled taverns lost.

    Posted by BJR | August 3, 2010, 5:46 pm

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Brand Positioning Tip #3: The Brand Mantra « Dark Matter Matters - July 21, 2009

  2. Pingback: Brand positioning tip #6: build peninsulas, not islands « Dark Matter Matters - January 27, 2010

  3. Pingback: Brand positioning tip #11: the 1-2 punch « Dark Matter Matters - June 3, 2010

  4. Pingback: Brand positioning tip #12: Don’t get hung up on the words « Dark Matter Matters - July 23, 2010

  5. Pingback: Brand positioning tip #13: embedding positioning internally « Dark Matter Matters - September 22, 2010

  6. Pingback: How to test your brand positioning: is it desirable, deliverable, and differentiated? « Dark Matter Matters - October 24, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Hey, I Wrote a Book!

The Ad-Free Brand: Secrets to Building Successful Brands in a Digital World

Available now in print and electronic versions.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 139 other followers

%d bloggers like this: